• Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • English
    • Italiano
    • Deutsch
    • Français
    • Español
    • Português
    • 简体中文
STEP Lab
  • Home
  • Company
    • About us
    • Latest news
    • Blog
    • Exhibitions
    • STEP Lab worldwide
  • Products
    • Dynamic and fatigue test systems
      • Linear motor-based systems
      • Electromechanical systems
    • Shock absorber testing machines
      • HUD/XUD - High/Ultra-high dynamic systems
      • LUD - Shock dynos
      • KUD - Durability systems
      • EOL - End of Line systems
    • High strain rate systems
    • Impact testing machines
    • Static testing machines
      • Creep testing machines
    • Multi actuator systems
      • Axial torsion systems
      • Multi-axial systems
      • Planar biaxial cruciform systems
    • Torsional testing machines
    • Footwear testing systems
      • Ski boots testing machines
      • Prostheses testing systems
    • Robot-based testing systems
    • Components and Accessories
      • Linear motor actuators
      • Electromechanical actuators
      • Climatic chambers
      • Specimen grips
    • Software & Controller
      • Software
      • Test controller
    • View all products
  • Extensometers
  • Applications
    • Industrial sectors
      • Automotive
      • Shock absorbers
      • Bicycle
      • Sports
      • Materials
      • EV Battery testing
      • Biomedical
      • University
      • Springs
    • Standards
      • ASTM
      • ISO
      • EN
      • Other Standards
    • Test Types
      • Fatigue Test
      • Impact Test
      • Tensile Test
      • Compression Test
      • Torsion Test
      • Bend Test
      • Shear Test
      • Fracture Test
      • Creep Test
      • Peel Test
  • Services
    • Testing laboratory
    • Maintenance
    • Calibration
    • Customer support
  • Catalogues
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu

HOW TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT ACTUATOR FOR YOUR TESTING

Selecting the appropriate actuator is a crucial step in designing effective and reliable testing systems. The choice depends on the type of tests you perform, the specific requirements of your application, and the characteristics of the actuator itself. This guide will walk you through the key factors to consider and compare two popular options: Electromechanical and electrodynamic actuators.

PAGE CONTENT

Toggle
  • HOW TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT ACTUATOR FOR YOUR TESTING
    • Electromechanical vs Electrodynamic actuators
    • Understanding the two technologies
      • Electromechanical actuators (Ball screw type)
      • Electrodynamic actuators (Linear motor type)
    • Side-by-side comparison
    • When to choose electromechanical actuators
    • When to choose electrodynamic actuators
    • Conclusion
    • FAQ

Electromechanical vs Electrodynamic actuators

The selection of an appropriate actuator for a testing system represents a critical design decision with direct implications for test accuracy, repeatability, and overall system performance. The actuator serves as the central element that defines the system’s dynamic/static capabilities.

The two main technologies are:

  • Electromechanical actuators (based on ball screw mechanisms)
  • Electrodynamic actuators (based on linear motors)

Each offers distinct advantages and limitations. This guide will help you understand the differences and make the best choice for your test needs.

Understanding the two technologies

Electromechanical actuators (Ball screw type)

Electromechanical actuators use a rotating motor connected to a precision ball screw that converts rotary motion into linear movement. These systems are highly controllable, energy efficient, and robust. They are widely used in structural testing, fatigue testing, and in any application requiring precise displacement or force over long durations.

Key features:

  • High force capacity
  • Precise control at low speed
  • Longer stroke capabilities
  • Lower power consumption

Electrodynamic actuators (Linear motor type)

Electrodynamic actuators produce direct linear motion without any mechanical transmission elements. The force is generated by a magnetic field acting on a moving coil or magnet. These systems excel at high-speed, high-frequency applications where fast response and low inertia are critical.

Key features:

  • High dynamic response (up to 1000 Hz)
  • Low maintenance due to no mechanical contact
  • Ideal for vibration, impact, or NVH testing
  • Compact and clean design
  • Requires active cooling and high-power electronics

Side-by-side comparison

FEATURE Electromechanical Electrodynamic
Force output Very high Moderate (best for dynamic loads)
Speed Moderate Very high (excellent for dynamic tests)
Frequency range Up to 30-50 Hz Up to 1000 Hz
Stroke lenght Long strokes available Short to medium strokes
Control accuracy Excellent at low speeds Excellent at high speeds
Energy efficiency High (only consumes energy when in motion) Moderate
Noise Low Moderate
Cooling Air Air/Water
Maintenance needs
Almost zero
Environmental impact
Clean, no fluids and oil-free
Cost
Cost-effective over time

When to choose electromechanical actuators

Opt for electromechanical actuators if:

  • You need high force output for static, quasi-static, or fatigue testing.
  • Your test requires long strokes with precise control over displacement.
  • The system will run for long durations, such as 24/7 fatigue or creep testing.
  • Energy efficiency and cost containment are priorities.
  • You’re testing mechanical assemblies, structures, or polymers with long displacement ramps.

At STEP Lab, our EA series of electromechanical actuators are used worldwide for static and fatigue tests across aerospace, automotive, and material science applications.

Forward Forward Find out more about EA Series

When to choose electrodynamic actuators

Choose electrodynamic actuators if:

  • You need to simulate dynamic events: vibration, shocks, impacts, or road profiles.
  • Your application requires high frequency, such as up to 1000 Hz.
  • You want frictionless, backlash-free motion with minimal maintenance.
  • Your testing involves NVH, seat testing, or damper/suspension evaluation.
  • You prioritize cleanroom compatibility, low noise, and smooth motion.

Our UD series electrodynamic actuators form the base for all high-speed systems we deliver, including: HUD, KUD and XUD. These systems are trusted for advanced durability and dynamic simulations, offering unparalleled response speed and accuracy.

Forward Forward Find out more about UD Series

Conclusion

There’s no universal winner when it comes to choosing between electromechanical and electrodynamic actuators. Your test profile, performance requirements, and budget will determine the right technology.

  • Electromechanical actuators are ideal for high loads, low frequencies, static or dynamic testing. They combine precision, efficiency, and lower maintenance in a robust and scalable design.
  • Electrodynamic actuators excel in high-speed, high-frequency dynamic testing where responsiveness and control accuracy are critical. With no mechanical wear components, they offer silent, clean, and nearly maintenance-free operation.

At STEP Lab, we design and manufacture both technologies to fit your exact needs, from standard systems to fully customized test benches. If you’re planning your next test setup or need guidance on actuator selection, our team of engineers is here to help.

Forward Forward Contact us

FAQ

1. What is the primary difference between electromechanical and electrodynamic actuators?

Electromechanical actuators are designed for precision and stability in static and slow cyclic tests, using motors and screws to generate motion. Electrodynamic actuators, on the other hand, are optimized for high-speed, dynamic applications, relying on electromagnetic coils for rapid and responsive movements.

2. Which type of actuator is better for high-frequency fatigue testing?

Electrodynamic actuators are better suited for high-frequency fatigue testing due to their ability to operate at high speeds and simulate dynamic real-world conditions such as vibrations and impacts.

3. Are electromechanical actuators more energy-efficient than electrodynamic ones?

Yes, electromechanical actuators are generally more energy-efficient, particularly for static and slow-speed applications. Electrodynamic actuators consume more energy, especially at higher frequencies.

4. Can electromechanical actuators handle dynamic applications?

While electromechanical actuators can handle some dynamic applications, they are not ideal for high-speed or high-frequency tasks. For such scenarios, electrodynamic actuators are more suitable.

5. Can STEP Lab’s actuators be customized for specific applications?

Yes! At STEP Lab, we offer customizable electromechanical and electrodynamic actuators designed to meet the unique needs of our clients. Contact us to discuss your testing challenges and discover how we can help.

byNicola D./4 September 2025/inNews/actuators, electrodynamic, electromechanical
Explore our catalog or contact us to find the right product for your business together.
Contact us Brochure

STEP LAB
Via Castellana 199, Resana 31023 (TV), IT
Tel.: +39 04231999391
P.IVA 04199670268 - REA: TV-331454

11148 Treynorth Dr., Suite C
28031 Cornelius (NC), USA
Tel.: +1-980-252-3268
OUR PRODUCTS

Dynamic and fatigue machines
Impact testing machines
Shock dynos
Multi actuator systems
Climatic chambers
OTHER PAGES

Privacy - Cookie Policy
Careers
We are sponsoring
STEP LAB

Youtube
Linkedin
Facebook
Instagram
Link to: Why choose EA series over hydraulic machines Link to: Why choose EA series over hydraulic machines Why choose EA series over hydraulic machines Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

Or contact us via email at info@step-lab.com or by phone at +3904231999391.

  • English
  • Italiano
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • Português
  • 简体中文